Directed by: Sajid Khan
Starring: Ajay Devgn, Tamanna Bhatia,
Paresh Rawal, Zarina Wahab
Released: 2013
Verdict: destroy every
copy – horrible – bad – whatever – flawed but enjoyable -
good – great – amazing
When I reviewed the famous
(and overrated as hell) 1983 Himmatwala some time ago, I expressed a
thought that any remake can only be better. I am not going to eat my
words. At least not entirely. It is bad, quite bad actually. Maybe
even as bad. But worse it is not. And frankly while it deserved
severe criticism, I don´t think it was as horrible as critics made
it sound. I don´t think they even try to be fair when it comes to
Sajid Khan, who has never been their favourite thanks to his
overconfident attitude that understandably rubs them the wrong way
(me too, but he has yet to insult me personally.) In the end
Himmatwala flopped – very much deservedly, but at the same time it
is not the worst film of the year by far – something many have been
trying to prove.
There are things that are
different from the 1983 film (I don´t want to say „original“
since I am not sure it was „original“ - more like a remake of
something too) and there are things that remain untouched.
Unfortunatelly the elements Sajid Khan decided to keep are often what
makes the whole movie seem regressive instead of initiating an
avalanche of nostalgia among 30+ audience. And so a wife has to stay
with her abusive husband, because you know – family honour! And
evil women wear mini-skirts, so when they suddenly shift to sarees
you realize they mended their ignoble ways. And an attempt at morally
„right“ approach towards rapists may be understandable from a
certain point of view, but again it is just violence and violence
only. Threw in a gay joke or two, just to be sure you are funny. And
if the audience did not get it, make it really obvious, that you are
making fun now. 1-2-3-laugh!
I was glad that Ravi
(Ajay) did not suffer from a memory loss, unlike his predecessor, and
I liked how they changed his identity. Unfortunatelly Ajay Devgn may
be a great action hero, but his attempt at comedy don´t go well. He
is, much like Jeetendra, too old for the role, and if not that he is
definitely too old for his heroine. Tamanna Bhatia, whom I really
like and adore, have been making waves down in the South, but she is
yet to make her mark on Bollywood map, and for her sake (and the
fangirl in me who is ready to love her) I hope her next Hindi venture
will offer her more scope. She does well in her small role, her
expressions are delightful and she dances beautifully. Paresh Rawal
in ridiculous get-up is not funny. And Zarina Wahab as the new-age
suffering Maa has nothing on epic crying Maas of the past.
That the film is over the
top, ridiculous and just full of loopholes goes without saying. Sajid
Khan is hated by critics also because of making most ridiculous
movies that, as many feel, are made to mock their intelligence. But
my peeve against Sajid is a bit different: I don´t think he is a
good story teller. Even simplistic, silly cinema can be worth your
money if it keeps you entertained, but not this. Himmatwala is an
example of lazy filmmaking, trying to ride the masalla wave, that,
however, can only end up in a blind alley after a while.
The marketing line of „80s
will be back“ did not lie, but who in the world wants Bollywood 80s
back? It is actually quite depressing to think that 30 years have
caused a very little progress in the minds of some people (quite a
few people – Himmatwala may have fopped but it still earned around
60 crore). Oh - if you really want to see a hand-to-paw combat with
a tiger, I recommend to watch the „rascalla“ scene from Om Shanti
Om over this.
Himmatwala is the remake of Jitendra's hit movie of same title.
ReplyDeleteI know. And that original was just as awful.
DeleteHimmatwala is a funny, romantic and action movie. I saw so many seen of this movie where ajay did good work. Movies Video Songs is my Bollywood blog.
ReplyDeleteI've no words to say about Sajid Khan's directorial venture 'Himmatwala', a remake of the 1983 movie of the same name. The original version is much more entertaining even in this day compared to the recent version of the movie.
ReplyDeleteI disagree. As bad as this film was, the original was just insufferable bore thanks to the main lead and his ridiculous image.
Delete